<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>A Conservative Wanderer - Latest Comments</title><link>http://aconservativewanderer.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://aconservativewanderer.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 21:29:58 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: More Than 20 Republican Senators Vote For Cloture On Comprehensive Immigration Reform (UPDATED: Roll Call added)</title><link>http://conservative-wanderer.com/2013/06/11/more-than-20-republican-senators-vote-for-cloture-on-comprehensive-immigration-reform/#comment-944855294</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Do you understand that if the first cloture vote had failed, the bill likely would have been tabled at that point?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Look, you got caught in a mistake, man up and admit that you were wrong and quit trying to prove that you're the smartest kid on the block.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Conservative Wanderer</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 21:29:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More Than 20 Republican Senators Vote For Cloture On Comprehensive Immigration Reform (UPDATED: Roll Call added)</title><link>http://conservative-wanderer.com/2013/06/11/more-than-20-republican-senators-vote-for-cloture-on-comprehensive-immigration-reform/#comment-944851739</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Do you even understand anything on the political process? Your condemnation of Paul was because he voted on cloture on the motion to proceed. That means he voted to bring it to the floor for debate so he could say why it should not be passed. You should not be condemning him for doing that; he has always said he would vote against the bill, and he did.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 21:24:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More Than 20 Republican Senators Vote For Cloture On Comprehensive Immigration Reform (UPDATED: Roll Call added)</title><link>http://conservative-wanderer.com/2013/06/11/more-than-20-republican-senators-vote-for-cloture-on-comprehensive-immigration-reform/#comment-944833159</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You, sir, need to check your facts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The roll call vote I was referring to took place on 11 June (same date as this post) and is number 146. There is a link in the article above, but &lt;a href="http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=113&amp;amp;session=1&amp;amp;vote=00146" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=113&amp;amp;session=1&amp;amp;vote=00146"&gt;I'll give you another one here&lt;/a&gt; for your convenience.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You will see if you look that Senator Paul is indeed listed as a "Yea" vote in the vote I was referring to.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You are entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts. Kindly make sure you know what you're talking about before you open your mouth on my blog again.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Conservative Wanderer</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 20:55:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More Than 20 Republican Senators Vote For Cloture On Comprehensive Immigration Reform (UPDATED: Roll Call added)</title><link>http://conservative-wanderer.com/2013/06/11/more-than-20-republican-senators-vote-for-cloture-on-comprehensive-immigration-reform/#comment-944825635</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You need to get your facts straight instead of disparaging Mr. Paul with the wrong list. Rand Paul voted against both cloture and passage, as is listed in the official Senate record on their website. You also left out Murkowski, who actually voted Yae for both cloture and passage. I stopped counting inaccuracies in your list at that point, but I'd suggest not posting slanderous info. &lt;a href="http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=113&amp;amp;session=1&amp;amp;vote=00168" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=113&amp;amp;session=1&amp;amp;vote=00168"&gt;http://www.senate.gov/legis...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 20:44:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More Than 20 Republican Senators Vote For Cloture On Comprehensive Immigration Reform (UPDATED: Roll Call added)</title><link>http://conservative-wanderer.com/2013/06/11/more-than-20-republican-senators-vote-for-cloture-on-comprehensive-immigration-reform/#comment-938223117</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I read Goldwaters book, Conscience of a Conservative, copyright about 1960.  Its a very short book, to the point and highly illustrative of how far the Republican party has come in 50 years.  You are 100% accurate.  The Repugs are now Demons and the Demons are now full blown socialists.  Its easy to locate and secure that book from the library.  You will be absolutely amazed at how far the Republican party has come in 50 years.  I want to make your acquaintance as I do of any Americans that are informed and awake.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guy Daley</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 22:28:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s Time To Fight!</title><link>http://conservative-wanderer.com/2013/03/19/its-time-to-fight/#comment-836424738</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's kind of an all-inclusive package. I like the idea of GOP standing for something besides "Grand Old Party," which most people don't even know is the original meaning of GOP. :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Conservative Wanderer</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 18:34:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s Time To Fight!</title><link>http://conservative-wanderer.com/2013/03/19/its-time-to-fight/#comment-836423877</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wouldn't consider "stop letting them slander us" much of a re-branding, myself.....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Foxfier</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 18:33:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Clear Look At The Sequester</title><link>http://conservative-wanderer.com/2013/02/25/a-clear-look-at-the-sequester/#comment-813261169</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Kinda makes all the sturm und drang from the Democrats seem a little overblown, doesn’t it?"  To say the least&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SineWaveII</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 15:27:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: List Of Republican Representatives Voting For The Fiscal Cliff Tax Hike</title><link>http://conservative-wanderer.com/2013/01/03/list-of-republican-representatives-voting-for-the-fiscal-cliff-tax-hike/#comment-761260795</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Off with their heads". The Queen of Hearts&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bart Britt</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 09:45:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: List Of Republican Representatives Voting For The Fiscal Cliff Tax Hike</title><link>http://conservative-wanderer.com/2013/01/03/list-of-republican-representatives-voting-for-the-fiscal-cliff-tax-hike/#comment-761259843</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Off with there heads. Queen of Hearts&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 09:44:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Brent Bozell Pressures RNC On Taxes</title><link>http://conservative-wanderer.com/2012/11/29/brent-bozell-pressures-rnc-on-taxes/#comment-741936733</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And I've written at length about spending. But you also have to let the American people keep the money they work hard for.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Conservative Wanderer</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 12:51:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Brent Bozell Pressures RNC On Taxes</title><link>http://conservative-wanderer.com/2012/11/29/brent-bozell-pressures-rnc-on-taxes/#comment-741931604</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is probably the dumbest thing I have heard.  Does it really matter where the Federal Monster gets its money?  If the government borrows trillions of dollars from the future no big deal.  Hey, here is big  check for "deficits don't matter" Cheney.  But heaven forbid current taxes go up.  The issue is not how the Federal government is financed: current taxes, future taxes, or printing money.  Raising taxes is bad economic policy, but it is not the underlying problem.  The problem is the SPENDING!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mammoth76</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 12:47:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GM Bailout Could Be Undone By Same Judge That Allowed It</title><link>http://conservative-wanderer.com/2012/10/08/gm-bailout-could-be-undone-by-same-judge-that-allowed-it/#comment-729555975</link><description>&lt;p&gt;YES, my family had about 500K in a secured bond with them when they flipped the rules on bankruptcy and screwed them.  Please flip this case.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">theeprog8r</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 15:39:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Brent Bozell Pressures RNC On Taxes</title><link>http://conservative-wanderer.com/2012/11/29/brent-bozell-pressures-rnc-on-taxes/#comment-722841441</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Absolutely agree...although I gave zilch to Priebus this last election cycle, anyway. He struck me as a bozo. I donated to Jim Demint and the Heritage Foundation.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eggsterguy</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 12:53:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Journalism for Bloggers 101</title><link>http://conservative-wanderer.com/2012/11/10/journalism-for-bloggers-101/#comment-708004880</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't see an email for him, so here.&lt;br&gt;1. Tech blogger stuff, like stats, mainly how to drill down to see where you are effective. When blogging on the edge of the right blogosphere, feedback is light. Hooks, media, tags&lt;br&gt;2. An online course? 20-50 depending on depth of class. &lt;br&gt;3. Sessions about an hour, so someone could do them for a lunch hour.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Leslie Loftis</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 00:29:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GM Bailout Could Be Undone By Same Judge That Allowed It</title><link>http://conservative-wanderer.com/2012/10/08/gm-bailout-could-be-undone-by-same-judge-that-allowed-it/#comment-678295043</link><description>&lt;p&gt;" . . .  they lined the streets all with ROMNEY SIGNS   and I assume that was clear across the country."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Clear across the country? Hardly. There was very little visual coverage of that particular trip. Usually, they play those trips up to show O's "massive support." This time, they mostly just told us about the "massive support", without pictures.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I wonder why they covered this one differently? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bobby_b</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 11:10:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GM Bailout Could Be Undone By Same Judge That Allowed It</title><link>http://conservative-wanderer.com/2012/10/08/gm-bailout-could-be-undone-by-same-judge-that-allowed-it/#comment-677346879</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I Now cant walk on my left foot,turns out the recalled buick failed and I was in a 1 car accident ,faulty steering ,well I saw a window into this and filed a claim for $80 MILLION , BUT  surprise, surprise, surprise seems in 2006 i filed with Social Security and have still not recieved word on my claim (Fox Protecting the Fox that raided the Hen House),it is now in 8th circut of appeals “how’s that for irony” Those 3 panel judges saw the fraud ,,I have an Appeal in the 9th? NY  circut against GM still Pending ,I think maybe I might get my claim after all,I Know both cases were heading to the SCOTUS and surely they would have ruled in my favor of some sort of award,I am Lucky to be Alive ,I just cant walk normal or use any left side of my body ,It even affects going #1 and #2 , No Money in the world can replace that ,well Thanks Mom and Dad ,if you had anything to do with it Thanks ,RIP and till one day we meet again Love Ya&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom Smalley</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 09:07:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GM Bailout Could Be Undone By Same Judge That Allowed It</title><link>http://conservative-wanderer.com/2012/10/08/gm-bailout-could-be-undone-by-same-judge-that-allowed-it/#comment-677325915</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well... Well... We finally get an HONEST JUDGE!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Seems there is some integrity LEFT in their Ranks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There should be no DOUBT that if OBAMA is reelected.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This JUDGE will be removed from the case.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What America needs to know.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;is that Obama, IS, HAS BEEN, and WILL BE DISHONEST with the America People. IF it advances his POWER and helps out the BIG UNIONS.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;VOTE NO FOR OBAMA AND THE DEMORATS IN NOVEMBER. &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bob Miller</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 08:46:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GM Bailout Could Be Undone By Same Judge That Allowed It</title><link>http://conservative-wanderer.com/2012/10/08/gm-bailout-could-be-undone-by-same-judge-that-allowed-it/#comment-677174226</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I only know that about 20,000 workers from  from 2 Dayton Ohio and surrounding Plants  lost $20,000-35,000 in Retirement funs THAT THEY PAID IN.   When Obama came to Dayton they lined the streets all with ROMNEY SIGNS   and I assume that was clear across the country..And to shake your memory  They closed 2,200 self sufficent family owned dealerships that had been in business since conception of GM  and a loss of 220,000 loyay dealership employees...Everytime govt. get involved its always  bad   just ask NASA.....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rick Sheldon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 06:31:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GM Bailout Could Be Undone By Same Judge That Allowed It</title><link>http://conservative-wanderer.com/2012/10/08/gm-bailout-could-be-undone-by-same-judge-that-allowed-it/#comment-677094755</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If the media would do even a "sufficient" job of covering Obama's antics, they would have uncovered this.  When the administration is allowed to act with no accountability whatsoever, they get away with murder!!!!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ZuZu'sPetals</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 05:10:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GM Bailout Could Be Undone By Same Judge That Allowed It</title><link>http://conservative-wanderer.com/2012/10/08/gm-bailout-could-be-undone-by-same-judge-that-allowed-it/#comment-677034364</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Don't worry lawyers will drag the ruling out way past the election.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Gann Sr</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 03:53:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GM Bailout Could Be Undone By Same Judge That Allowed It</title><link>http://conservative-wanderer.com/2012/10/08/gm-bailout-could-be-undone-by-same-judge-that-allowed-it/#comment-676645061</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is it a judge's job to save jobs or to follow the rule of law?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Autumn123</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 21:03:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GM Bailout Could Be Undone By Same Judge That Allowed It</title><link>http://conservative-wanderer.com/2012/10/08/gm-bailout-could-be-undone-by-same-judge-that-allowed-it/#comment-676542527</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wonder if there is any chance that the shares of old GM stock would be valid again (even if not worth much)? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KWalsh</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 18:10:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GM Bailout Could Be Undone By Same Judge That Allowed It</title><link>http://conservative-wanderer.com/2012/10/08/gm-bailout-could-be-undone-by-same-judge-that-allowed-it/#comment-676440777</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I know Gerber. He is a weasel.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fat_Man</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 15:35:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GM Bailout Could Be Undone By Same Judge That Allowed It</title><link>http://conservative-wanderer.com/2012/10/08/gm-bailout-could-be-undone-by-same-judge-that-allowed-it/#comment-676433418</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Had they gone through a traditional structured bankruptcy, GM would still be in business, their suppliers would still be in business and the secured parties that got stiffed would have been paid - primarily pension funds and 401Ks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In addition, the bankruptcy court would almost certainly have restructured GM's union contracts, reducing their hourly wage to something like market and driving a stake through the heart of their pension and heath care benefit packages.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As it stands today, GM is "still in business", but their position is tenuous at best.  Their labor costs in the US are still 50% higher than their competition and their Euro marketing group is on their last breath.  In addition, the UAW effectively controls the GM board, given the seats they've been given and the seat the US government holds, and they will certainly vote those shares (almost 1/3 of the total outstanding) in favor of whatever the UAW wants.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I hope the judge overturns the whole package.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NotASheep</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 15:24:43 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>